The child of the country is
the 'stranger'.
|
Anne Townsend | 16
september 2011
|
Will you please excuse me if this lines
sound like the vicar's homelie.... For a few months I have heard being
said here and there: « there are so few of us in these
villages! We ought to be able to get on together. » I agree;
I
entirely agree. But how are we to set about it?
First we must accept the chilly reality
that nothing is easier than to create hell for a neighbour and for
the community as a whole, if it is what we wish for whatever reason.
Yes, we all have a great power of disruption, even perversion, power
to disarm the best intentions, if we wish to do so either in a spirit
of revenge or simply to test our power. An accusing finger would be of
no use.
Let's recognize that we are all capable of harbouring this
negativity, if not being guilty of it.
The second measure to take
is more
positive: let's ask ourselves what is the strong point of our own
personnality and how we can put it to the service of the community.
Then, let's ask ourselves the same question as far as the 'neighbour'
is concerned and let's encourage each other to 'build' the community.
All very well, but we have to get to
know him, this neighbour. Hence the importance to meet on neutral
ground, leaving aside conflicts. But do we wish to meet? May be not
if the other is 'the stranger, the foreigner, whose word will never
weigh as much as that of the 'enfant du pays', the 'native', who,
surely, has more rights than the disturbing outsider.
Here, to show that this antagonism
should not exist, I would like to speak of a writer, native of the
Cevennes, who expanded at great length and with much love on his
native province: Andre Chamson. This
member of the Academie Francaise
said of himself the he was a citizen of the world and, at the same
time, said that his real, profound self, was everything that was
'native' in him. In other words, the Cevennes had moulded him.
He did
not want to be a regionalist writer, but he recognised that his
roots were who he was
To be what your roots are and at
the
same time citizen of the world... Why not let the world come into our
villages from the outside? |
And I have said 'our', because this
village of Valquieres, I adopted it 20 years ago when we discovered
the house we bought and came to love.
Now I would love Valquieres to
adopt us, my husband and myself. Am I
condemned to be an eternal
stranger because my father chose to enter the French Navy with all
the removals which this career entails, and consequently, the lack of
roots? He fought the nazis in solidarity with everyone involved.
As for my English husband,
his paternal
grandfather rests in a French cemetery, in the Somme. How many
Brits
gave their lives on the French battle fields during WW1? His maternal
grandfather was lost at sea – along with several uncles –
during
WW2, all victims of nazism. Here
too, didn't the Brits show a
generous solidarity with France? And the victory was for all
French
people, including the inhabitants of our commune. Could we then stop
ranking the inhabitants according to a hierarchy where the top are
'les enfants du pays'? Could we all be treated as equal citizens?
A more serious consequence
of the
perception of the other as 'the outsider' is the underlying gut fear,
often unrecognised, of the difference, the unknown, therefore of what
we don't understand.
Fear which can lead to aggressivity, to
discrimination, to rejection of the other. Is it what we really want?
While everywhere, in schools in particular, tolerance is being
taught, and the fact that the difference found in the other will turn
out to be a richness if we bother to understand it. To try to
understand the other's point of view is an opening of the mind. If we
want to appreciate a sculpture, you must not look at it from one
angle only, but study it from every angle. Or else, let's remember
this Indian proverb which tells us that to get to know someone we
have to walk a few miles wearing his shoes.
In the same way, our
neighbour, 'enfant
du pays' or stranger, who seems to be too 'different' – if not
mad
– or too dull and down to earth - has a unique and interesting
personality which we should discover and appreciate. In this task of
discovery we can only be winners. |
|